<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ipv6 on Anything About IT</title><link>https://www.verboon.info/tags/ipv6/</link><description>Recent content in Ipv6 on Anything About IT</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:09:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.verboon.info/tags/ipv6/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Argument against Disabling IPv6</title><link>https://www.verboon.info/2010/03/the-argument-against-disabling-ipv6/</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:09:54 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.verboon.info/2010/03/the-argument-against-disabling-ipv6/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Last Friday I met with some friends I used to work with in the past and we had some talk about Windows 7 and IPv6. One had mentioned that they would explicitly disable the IPv6 on the client systems, this because they would not use it and they wanted to avoid unnecessary network traffic on their LAN/WAN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Back home I did some searches on the internet and found the below statement in the &lt;a href="http://207.46.16.252/en-us/magazine/2009.07.cableguy.aspx"&gt;Support for IPv6 in Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7&lt;/a&gt; Microsoft TechNet Magazine article.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Some thoughts on IPv6</title><link>https://www.verboon.info/2009/02/some-thoughts-on-ipv6/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:52:54 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.verboon.info/2009/02/some-thoughts-on-ipv6/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;About 3 years ago when Windows Vista was on the horizon there has been a lot of talk around &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6"&gt;IPv6&lt;/a&gt;. But since then, at least in the environment I work in, it has become quiet around this topic. On Wikipedia we can read that based on a &lt;a href="http://rosie.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-57/presentations/uploads/Thursday/Plenary%2014:00/upl/Colitti-Global_IPv6_statistics_-_Measuring_the_current_state_of_IPv6_for_ordinary_users_.7gzD.pdf"&gt;study&lt;/a&gt; from Google, penetration is still less than one percent of Internet traffic in any country&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But nowadays we more often hear about the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4_address_exhaustion"&gt;IPv4 Address exhaustion&lt;/a&gt; meaning that soon we will run out of IPv4 addresses. An interesting resource for this topic is the “&lt;a href="http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html"&gt;IPv4 Address Report&lt;/a&gt;”.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>IPv4 vs IPv6 Song</title><link>https://www.verboon.info/2009/02/ipv4-vs-ipv6-song/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:43:19 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.verboon.info/2009/02/ipv4-vs-ipv6-song/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In my next blog post i will address the IP version 6 topic, but let me first share this amusing video I found while I was collecting information around IPv6. It’s really worth listening.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>